Thursday, February 18, 2010

News and Discussion Programs

Group 1

The first video is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba

20100221034809(1)
Yükleyen edasworld. - TV dizilerini ve programlarını online izleyin.


The second video is done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak

DİLEK DEMİRAYAK, TUĞBA AYDIN, ECE GÜZEL
Yükleyen eceguzelll. - Filmler ve diziler Dailymotion'da


Group 2

The first video is done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş

news & discussion
Yükleyen fatmasavas. - Partiler, yurt hayatı ve diğer üniversite videoları.

The second video is done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan

News and Discussion Program (IDE106)
Yükleyen neco085. - Üniversite videoları.

Group 3

The first video is done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün

rahman sağlam - haber
Yükleyen rahmansaglam. - TV dizilerini ve programlarını online izleyin.

The second video is done by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran

news and discussion programs
Yükleyen hilaltorun71. - Diğer yaşam videolarına göz atın.

The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak

Betül Bekyiğit, Aslı Karaçokak, Kısmet Turhan
Yükleyen fenerli47. - Diğer yaşam ve moda videoları.

The fourth video is done by Mehmet Başdaş,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç

Mehmet Başdaş, Latif Karakılınç, Maviş Cinal ( MLM News)
Yükleyen fenerli47. - Diğer yaşam videolarına göz atın.

156 comments:

  1. We are expected to write our comments only here?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1st GROUP: The first video that is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba: It has got very interesting topic and it's well prepared. about the intonation and pronunciation I like the anchorwoman's talk most. She's speaking very fluently but another tiny detail is she should have spoken more lively.When it comes to another girls, the doctor and the mother; they are succesfull enough but the doctor should have spoken a lil bit more fluently. Cong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1st GROUP: The second video which was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak: It is a nice video because they took care about the scene, their clothes and they didn't forget the tiny details such as showing the short sections. However, while the anchorwoman saying the words one by one, the correspondant and the basketball player is much more succesfull about the fluency. I think The anchorwoman should take care of her int. and pronunciation most. Anyway, i liked it, thanks..

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: About this video i liked it a lot because they have everything there should be in a studio. The idea of slides is very good and the gestures are the second thing ı liked they are successfull.And I love Fatma Savas' voice and intonation very much. She's speaking so softly that ı could listen her further:) But on the other hand, the video is a lil bit dark and it is impossible to see if they are reading, that's the thing ı didn't like. And Fatma's speech and apparition are not simultaneously. Generally very good, cong. :

    ReplyDelete
  6. 2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: there is another comment that i forgot to mention about. Is it really necessary to give the information step by step? In the beginning of the video the anchorman says the date and I'm beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: Actually, it's really entartaining,the topic is different and funny.But they should have spoken more fluently except the ''Neco''. The other thing is that it is not correct to say MR. Neco, Mr. Zana or Mr. Celal they should have prefered to use their surnames. And the other thing is the correpondent and Mr. Yılmaz were not supposed to know each other on this video but they are too close. They talked like they are friends and ı think they should have behave more convenient as if they were in a news program. Thanks, cong. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. 3rd GROUP: The first video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün: Was your microphone made from a comb and sock combination:))?really creative:)). Your pictures are very good but you should erase or blur the brand of course. And, whereas the anchorman seems to be very tense the correspondant and the student that they were talking are relaxed. Rahman if you try to be more relax u will do better ı believe. You will be speaking more fluently for the next time:)) Cong. guys:)

    ReplyDelete
  9. 3rd GROUP: The second video which was done by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran: It's one of the best videos ı think everything is OK. But ı wish the anchorwoman had spoken a lil bit more fluent and had not look at the paper. It is distracting.Another problem is they shouldn't have started the news with the pictures she should start the news program first then they should have shown them.The rest is very good. Cong. guys:)

    ReplyDelete
  10. 3rd GROUP: The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak: The anchorwoman and the correspondant are reading the news. As it is not a breaking news it is not good ı think. And the music is on from the beginning to the end and it makes it not audible and ı could not understand the news properly.They should have spoken more fluently but Alı is very good. Thanks, cong:)

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1st GROUP: The first video that is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba: it is a good job. anchorwoman speaks very fluently and her fluency affects me. she acts very good. the mother's and the doctor's pronounciation are well. they choose an interesting topic. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1st GROUP: The second video which was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak: their video is very good. showing news' pictures is a good idea. the anchorwoman's has a good pose. the correspondant and the basketball player speaks very fluently. also, thier dialog is interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: their enterance is very good. ı like their pronounciation. they speak fluently.their video's slides are very good.ı like their studio but it is a bit dark.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: the anchorman speaks fast. ı like their video. also, ı like their topic. it is a very entertaining video.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 3rd GROUP: The first video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün: it is a good video. showing pictures about the topic is a good idea. their pronounciations are good. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The first video which was done by Suzan Atak,Eda Kılınç and Zeynep Küçükoba:In generally it is a good video.they chose a different topic.All of them have good intonation and pronunciation but I think there is a problem in the volume of their video.Altough I turn on the volume of the computer till the latest level,I didn't hear the sentnces clearly.Anyway,I liked the the pronunciation and fluency of anchorwoman.others were good .thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: the video is abit dark and beginning the program like that is an awkward way to start because you are being too informative. the rest is ok. your studio looks so real. Fatma Savaş speaks so softly and has a well-balanced sound pitch. good job!

    ReplyDelete
  18. 3rd GROUP: The second video which was done by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran: is a very very good video. their enterance is interesting. it is a good topic. their pronounciations are very good. they speak fluently. choosing the area is a good idea.their news' final is also good. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  19. The first video which was done by Suzan Atak, Eda Kılınç and Zeynep Küçükoba: Its topic is an attractive one. The speaker is talking fluently. I think all of them are good at pronunciation and intonation. there is only one problem about it. It is that they should music or the name of channel.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: the topic is funny and evoking interest. the speaker could be a bit more fluent . the rest was ok good job actually!

    ReplyDelete
  21. The second video which was done by Dilek Demirayak, Ece güzel and Tuba Aydın:The video is good but topic is general.In fact,the scenes in the video are very nice.I think The speaker could have said th sentences more fluently but all of them have good intonation and pronunciation.Lastly,the video could be better if the player had made much more show.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 1stGROUP:The first video that was done by EdaKılınç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba: ıt is very good video. it is well-prepared.I liked their topic. especially,they speak fluently and their pronunciation and intonation are good. however, I wish anchorwoman had spoken more stressing by asking questions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. 3rd Group: the firsr video done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün: generally the video is w well-prepared one and they provide us with a lot of informative pictures about the product which makes the news really interesting. But anchorman lacks of fluency in some parts of his speech and seems a bit excited...

    ReplyDelete
  24. The second video which was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak: The speaker is talking very slow. She should speak a bit faster and effectively. Their starting of the program is good. There are some pronunciation mistakes. It was well done.

    ReplyDelete
  25. 3rd GROUP: The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak: using news' music is a good idea, but it may be a bit lower. their news' final is good.it is a good video.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The third video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen and Salih Güneş: The beginning of the news as real one. But the topic can be different. Their pronunciations are good. Intonation can be better. I think there is a problem with camera because their faces couldn't be seen clear. Fatma Savaş is talking fluently.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The third video which was done by Fatma Savaş,Yusuf Türen and Salih Güneş:It is a good idea to prepare a studio for the video but I think the studio is so dark that the faces of anchorman and his guest don't seem clearly.On the other hand ,the intonations and pronunciation of them are ganerally good.Lastly,I want to say that I like the voice of Fatma Savaş.

    ReplyDelete
  28. 2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: firstly the video starts with a wrong way by giving the information detailed at the beginning and the anchorman lacks fluency in some parts of his speech. the rest is well.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 3rd GROUP: The fourth video is done by Mehmet Başdaş,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç : it is the best video. it is really perfect. they prepared very well. everything in this video is perfect.thanks mehmet, maviş and latif.they are very succesful. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  31. The fourth video which was done by Celal Doğan, Zana Geçkin and Necdet Yılmaz: The presentation of Celal is very good, but Zana should be relax while speaking. Their intonation and pronunciation should be more fluent. Its topic isn't an attractive one.

    ReplyDelete
  32. 2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: the topic is interesting and different from the others the video is well-prepared.But the speaker lacks fluency the rest is ok....

    ReplyDelete
  33. The fifth video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün: I think the voices aren't very clear but their clothes are suitable to this program. The subject and pictures in harmony. They should speak more fluently.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The fourth video which was done by Zana Geçkin,Necdet Yılmaz and Celal Doğan:I can say that this video is the most entertaining video among the videos.I liked it very much.Celal's question and words while beginning the news are good .All are good at intonation but their video isn't exactly convincing.Zana's gestures while reporting the news are nice . Lastly,They could have spoken flıuently.

    ReplyDelete
  35. 1stGROUP:The second video that was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak: in general, it is as good video. I liked it. it is a good to show short sections. however, anchorwoman says the words one by one and doesn't speak fluently.It is distracting. I liked ece's pronunciation and intonation.

    ReplyDelete
  36. The sixth video which was done by Hilal Torun, Mehmet Kurtaran and Cumali Caran: I think it is one of the best videos which I watched. Its subject is attractive, its beginning is very good. I liked it very much. Also all of them are talking fluently. There isn't pronunciation mistake. The speaker is very serious and talks effectively.

    ReplyDelete
  37. The seventh video which was done by Betül Bekyiğit, Aslı Karaçokak and Kısmet Turhan: I think the speakers shouldn't read from paper. They should talk naturally. Pronunciation and intonation can be better.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Fifth video which was done by Rahman Sağlam ,Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün:It is a well-prepared video .I think Their voices are clear and understandable.The video is informative one.The clothes of them especially Rahman's clothes are so suitable for the news videos.The pictures ar good .It is a good job.

    ReplyDelete
  39. 2nd group:The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: beginning of their videos is a good idea.generally, the video is good but anchorman speaks without any intonation. their studio is dark, it is difficult to see their faces. fatma's pronunciation and intonation is very good but her speech is hoarse and it is a bit hard to understand her. however, it is well-prepard video.

    ReplyDelete
  40. 3rd GROUP: The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak: ıt seems that the speaker reads the news and the news they presenr is not a breaking news is is a bit diffucult to hear the music...

    ReplyDelete
  41. 1stGROUP:The second video that was done by Ece Güzel,Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak: firstly the speaker lacks fluency and there are a few pronunciaitıon mistakes except these it is a well-prepared one....

    ReplyDelete
  42. The sixth video which was done by Hilal Torun,Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran:I can say that it is the best video of news videos.It was so real that I felt myself as if I was watching news on tv.The scenes in the video ae very good.I liked video because the beginning and the final part of the video is in the suitable form.Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The eighth video which was done by Mehmet başdaş, Latif Karakılınç and Maviş Cinal: It is one of the best videos, too. All of them are talking very fluently. It is as a real one because they wear suitable clothes and thay are very serious. It is perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The seventh video which was done by Aslı Karaçokak,Betül Bekyiğit and Kısmet Turhan:It is a good one but I couldn't hear the voice of anchorwoman clearly.Their speches couldd be more fluent.On the other hand,the topic is general but Aslı and nagihan make role successfully.

    ReplyDelete
  45. 1st GROUP: The first video that is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba: the topic is very interesting and the anchorwoman speaks fluently adn good at intonation but the doctor speaks a bit slow, in general it is a well prepared one...

    ReplyDelete
  46. 2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: their video is entertaining and well-prepared. however, correspondent and Mr.Yılmaz speak each other like a friend. it shouldn' have been and I discerned that at the last of news,(like previous videos )they didn't say channel's , his own name and the place where he was.

    ReplyDelete
  47. The eighth video which was done by Mehmet başdaş, Latif Karakılınç and Maviş Cinal: I can say that it is one of the best video prepared.they speak fluently and good at intonation. while watching I felt that it was a real one...

    ReplyDelete
  48. The last video which was done by Mehmet Başdaş ,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç:I want to say that it is one of the best videos.Ewery thing is okey.The clothes of them are suitable for the video.The pronunciationss and intonations of them are really good.It is a real news for me .It is a very good job.Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  49. 3rd GROUP: The first video which was done by Kadir Fırat ,Rahman Sağlam, and Eyyüp Akgün: it is well-prepared video. I liked it.they took care of details such as saying name of channel..it is interesting. their pronunciations are good especially Eyüp. thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  50. the second video which was done by ece güzel, dilek demirayak and tugba aydın:I think this video is a good one. but if anchorwoman had spoken more fluently it would have been much better. I liked the pronunciation of all of them this is a very well-prepared video and tugba's last show is amazing....

    ReplyDelete
  51. 1stgroup: first of all I want to say zeynep 'you are perfect' I liked your performance very much your tpoic was good except a few spelling mistakes your video was good.....

    ReplyDelete
  52. The video by Nejdet,Zana and Celal is the funniest one I think. Their topic is really interesting. The pronunciation and intonation are good. By the way, Nejdet danced very well:))Good job...Thanks..

    ReplyDelete
  53. 3rd GROUP: The third video which was done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak:
    ı wish anchorwoman hadn't read the text. it is distracting. music is a good idea. their voices aren't audible.it could be better.

    ReplyDelete
  54. The second video by Tuğba Aydın, Dilek Demirayak and Ece Güzel was well-prepared I think. The anchorwoman talked in a serious way, and this was good. But she should have talked more lively. The basketball player was good with her score:)) I liked their pronunciation. Good job...Thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  55. 2. group: the video done by yusuf, salih and fatma: It is obvious that you worked hard for this project I think this is a good video. yusuf and salih stress the words very much but this is due to their mother tone I think, I likeed fatma's performance very much her pronunciation is very good but it was hard to see you clearly ı think the place you were in was a bit dark

    ReplyDelete
  56. 2nd groupI felt myself at the begining of your video that I would watch a news programm on cnn your video was perfect and creative the other thing I want to add that dilek had behaved as if she was a real anchorwoman.. good job..

    ReplyDelete
  57. the first video which was done by eda kılınç, zeynep küçükoba and suzan atak: the topic of the video is very interesting and attractive . I liked their pronuounciation and intonation, but eda (the presenter of the program) would talk more lively as it is an interesting topic. apart from these points, it would be better if they added a channel or tv name or an apropriate music to thier video. but in general I really liked the video. well-prepared....

    ReplyDelete
  58. The news by Fatma Savaş,Salih Güneş and Yusuf Türen was well-prepared also. Their intonation and pronunciation are good in my opinion. Especially, I liked Fatma's voice tone. The only problem in the video was that their faces are not clear...Good job...Thanks..

    ReplyDelete
  59. the video done by necdet, zana and celal: I think this video is very very entertaining. it was prepared very well and the topic is very interesting. they speak fluently. but they have to be more formal I think:)

    ReplyDelete
  60. the video which was done by ece güzel,tuba aydın and dilek demirayak is really successful...I really liked the video. it begins as if it is a real news program..the students also are successful in their pronounciation and intonation..maybe it would be better if the anchorwoman would speak fluently and more lively. all in all a very good video. cong...

    ReplyDelete
  61. 3rd group:althouh yusuf had some pronuancation mistakes his performance was very good as an anchorman and fatma was very good too.she had used some patterns used in news and this maked their news more persuasive........

    ReplyDelete
  62. 3. group: the video done by rahman, eyüp and kadir: this is a good video. the pronunciation of eyüp is very good and the microphone is very creative:) but the topic is ordinary I think. but in general, it is effective.

    ReplyDelete
  63. 4th group:except some pronouncation mistakes your video was perfect and very enjoyable and also your video had all the features of a news video... very good job:))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  64. The news by Rahman Sağlam,Eyüp Akgün and Kadir Fırat is well-prepared. They used some pictures of product,so the video is really an informative one. The anchorman is a bit nervous I think. Their clothes are suitable for the news. Thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  65. 3. group: the video done by hilal, memet and cumali: this video is a very well-prepared one. the topic is effective but I wish you have shown the environment that you were in(memet and cumali) it would have been more interesting

    ReplyDelete
  66. the video which was prepared by nejdet yılmaz, zana geçkin and celal doğan is very interesting and entertaning. they found a very good topic to make a news program on it. their pronounciation and intonation would be better. Moreover I couldn't catch any misprononced word. but they called each other as mr. celal. it is a wrong use because we use mr with surnames. Apart from these things I really liked the video. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  67. 5th group: the anchourman spoke too fast so I couldn't understand clearly what he meant and you had some pronouncation mistakes except these everthing was good

    ReplyDelete
  68. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  69. The news by Hilal Torun,Cumali Caran and Mehmet Kurtaran: It is one of the best videos I liked. I couldn't catch anything wrong about it. They prepared it really well. Conratulations...

    ReplyDelete
  70. 3rd Group: last video which was done by Mehmet Başdaş, Latif Karakılınç and Maviş Cinal. It is one of the best videos. it is like a real news program. your pronunciation and intonation are good esp. anchorwoman' speech. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  71. the video done by kısmet, aslı and betül:the anchorwoman reads the text, this is distracting. kısmet speaks fluently, but ı am not sure whether this music is suitable or not, the performance of aslı is good too

    ReplyDelete
  72. the video that was prepared by fatma, salih and yusuf: the video starts as if it is a real news program. the opening of the video is really good. but then the video bores a bit when the two men strats to talk. Apart from these details I especially liked fatma's pronounciation and intonation. the other firends' would be better however it is already good. moreover the video is a bit dark I think because of the room where they made the viedo, however a good video.cong friends...

    ReplyDelete
  73. 6th group : I think music was not suitable for a news programm especially for a catastrophe news and you had some pronouncation mistakes but using some patterns which are peculiar to news maked your video good and persuasive..

    ReplyDelete
  74. The news by Betül Bekyiğit,Aslı Karaçokak and Kısmet Turhan: Their voices are not so clear due to music I think. Their topic is interesting and they perfomed it well. Lastly, the anchorwoman shouln't read the text. But the video was good. Thanks.....

    ReplyDelete
  75. the video done by maviş, memet baştaş and latif: I think this video is among the best videos. they are in suitable clothes and they speak fluently. the pronunciation of maviş is very good and they are serios enough.

    ReplyDelete
  76. The news by Mehmet Başdaş, Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç is the best in my opinion. Their clothes are suitable for the news. Also their intonation and pronunciation are good. It is like a real news. Congratulations.....

    ReplyDelete
  77. kısmet's read the news form the paper a bit irritating she should have spoke naturally and you had som epronouncation mistakes but your video was suitable for a news format

    ReplyDelete
  78. the video prepared by rahman sağlam and his friends: I couldn't catch the words of the anchorman at the beginning of the video maybe he could speak more relaxed and fluently. the other friends' pronounciation and intonation were good. As a whole the video was well-prepared. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  79. In my opinion, the video which was prepared by mehmet başdaş and his friends is the best video. it is very obivious that they are well-prepared. their intonation and pronounciation are also good. In short, the video is very good for many aspects. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  80. the last video:maviş's performance was very good and recording the video in a hospital aws a good idea also interruping the reporter and asking him some questions was too.It was a good job but I wonder that if hillary clintion had an accident would she really come to toros devlet hastanesi?????::)))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  81. The video which was prepared by aslı and her friends was good , but it would be better. The anchorwoman spoke in a normal tone and intonation. maybe she would speak more lively. the other friends' intonation and pronounciation were good. there were some misprononced words such as the word audience, ı think. all in all a nice video. cong.

    ReplyDelete
  82. hilal and her friends' video is one of the best videos. I couldn't catch any misprononced word. well-done friends.cong.

    ReplyDelete
  83. the first group:the video prepared by eda kilınc,zeynep kücükoba and suzan atak is well prepared...Especially,zeynep's performance is so convincing,also the topic is really interesting and they speak fluently,good job thanks=))

    ReplyDelete
  84. 2.group:the first video prepared by fatma savas,yusuf türen and salih günes is not that attractive for me;the anchorman should speak by caring of intonation.In addition, fatma's fluency and intonation attracted me =)))cong.

    ReplyDelete
  85. 2.group:The second video prepared by necdet yılmaz,zana geckin and celal dogan is a good one.The topic and necdet's show is realy interesting.Also,celal speaks fluently,thanks

    ReplyDelete
  86. 3.group:the first video:The speeches are not very clear,they have some intonation mistakes but it is certain that they made an effort to it=))thanks

    ReplyDelete
  87. the video prepared by memet basdas,...is realy one of the best,a realy successful one with their good pronunciation and intonation,good job=))

    ReplyDelete
  88. The second video by Tuğba Aydın,Dilek Demirayak,and Ece Güzel was well-prepared. Their intonation and pronunciation are good. However, the anchor woman could have spoke more lively. But the rest was good. thanks....

    ReplyDelete
  89. the first video by Eda Kılıç and her friends is well done..all of them speak fluently and there were not intonation mistakes...but the anchorman could speak more quickly as in the real news...the mother exaggerated, 5000 people came to see her..it was good ...cong

    ReplyDelete
  90. in the 1st group: the video of Eda, Zeynep and Suzan, i think the topic is a good idea but it need something more to make it more atractive, may be it needs a little bit more fluency. however: the introduction and the end of the speech were good, according to the rules;) zeynep acted as if she were really the mother of such a baby with her speech and look, i liked her act alot.. eda was really serious,just like an anouncer

    ReplyDelete
  91. The video by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen and Salih Güneş was good with their intonation, pronunciation. The place in which the video performed is like the real one. The only bad thing is that their faces are not clear... But it was good... Thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  92. the video by Dlek and her friends is not an unsuccessful job but it could be better..Dilek is the anchorman but she speaks very slowly,by short pauses..l didnt hear any important mistakes related to grammar, intonation and spelling...lastly, the noise was heard more than ur voices..cong...

    ReplyDelete
  93. The video by Necdet Yılmaz, Zana Geçkin and Celal Doğan is the most entertaining one. I really liked it. Their speeches were good with intonation and pronunciation. Good job... Thanks..

    ReplyDelete
  94. The news by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün was really informative with the pictures of product. In my opinion it was good. However the anchorman was a bit nervous, and it could be better if he spoke more lively...However, it was good..Thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  95. The news by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Mehmet Kurtaran is really wonderful. They prepared it really well. Their clothes were suitable. They used their intonation and pronunciation well. Conratulations...

    ReplyDelete
  96. the video by Celal and his friends is a god job..the topic is interesting..in addition, zana and neco are very funny during the video. there were some minor mistakes such as ' give a intersting news' and ôpen a new category'...the rest was ok...neco...govend was very good...cong

    ReplyDelete
  97. The news by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokal was well-prepared.However I couldn't understand their voices well because of the music they used. Also the anchorwoman could be more fluent. Thanks....

    ReplyDelete
  98. 1.group: Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba
    I must admit that it is a very interesting news. the speechs are generally fluent. maybe the video could have been enriched. I mean it could have been like a news. good job again congratulations.

    2.group: Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak
    I liked your video. it really looks like a news. but your voice could have been higher I could not hear some parts. good job congratulations. by the way Tuğba I did not know that you are that skilled :D

    3.group: Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş
    great job men :D I liked it I could not find mistake. I just have to say that I could not see your face. Show them to us :D

    4.group: Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan
    You are fantastic men. You made a very good and interesting video. I liked it so much. just interesting is mispronounced. good job bodies :D I wish a long life for Neco too :D

    5.group: Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün
    it is a well prepared video. I just could not hear some parts. generally it is good. by the way it is an interesting invention :D conratulations.

    6.group: area, region are mispronounced. generally it is good congratulations :D

    7.group: Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak

    I m sorry but you should not read so much from the text. generally it is a good video. good job congratulations :D miracle :D

    8.group: Mehmet Başdaş,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç

    it is a well prepared video congratulations. I just could not hear some parts of Mehmet's speech. but generally fantastic :D by the way techology is wellused :D

    ReplyDelete
  99. The video by Mehmet Başdaş, Maviş cinal and Latif Karakılınç is the best in my opinion. They prepared it very well. Their intonation, pronunciation, and clothes are good. I liked it. Congratulation...

    ReplyDelete
  100. the video prepared by dilek,ece and tuba was over the average. dilek and ece speak fluently but in some part of her speech ı had trouble in understanding what tuba was saying. all in all it is a good video cong.=)

    ReplyDelete
  101. 1st video is very good organised video ı like the topic and it is not bored me while ı was watching. unfortunately there are some mispronounced words and the most realized one of them is actually said by zeynep. eda spoke nearly like a native speaker ı like their intonations although there was some unnecessary pauses. good work girls thank you... 2nd video is again a good work but there are some basic pronounciation mistakes like congragulate and the numbers. tuğba's voice is lower when it compared with ece and dilek. the organization of the video is marvellous ı think the starting, the end and the passes showed me the time which is spend on the video thank you girls....

    ReplyDelete
  102. 3rd videos topic a bit boring but the starting of the video is good. yusuf spoke a real news speaker. the light can be better but ı know it is not you fault. the intonation was not super in the whole of the video. fatma's performance was amazing ı feel there is a real earthquake and she is a real speaker. good job friends thank you...

    ReplyDelete
  103. 4th videos topic is enjoyable and interseting. although the topic was fasinating ı cannot say the video amazed me there are some pronounciation mistakes especially in the numbers. celal speaks like italians. good work boys thank you...

    ReplyDelete
  104. in the video of dilek, ece and tuba, i struggled to watch the video up to end because of the internet, the video couldnt be loaded properly,but dilek's speech is a bit slow, might be more fluently, tuba's voice was a bit low howeever in terms of the topic and acting or the sentences, the video is good, the transitions were good also, i know it was a hard prepared video due to some badluck, but u managed =))

    ReplyDelete
  105. i know that almost all of you said the video was a bit dark =( even though the lights were on, and before loading it to dailymotion, it wasnt so, i couldnt understand, may be the quality of the video decreased,dont know really, and thanks for all comments,especially about me, i will go on doing my best <))

    ReplyDelete
  106. in the second group: zana,necdet and celal, in the introduction part celal's speech was good and zana and necdet didnt speak too much, i think you should have used more sentences or transitions peculiar to news&and discussion, however your choice of topic was good, i couldnt catch any striking pronunciation mistakes :)

    ReplyDelete
  107. 5th video was answering the needs of a news discusiion video. however the recorder can be better then we can understand what you are saying easily. costumes and passes are good. the scene was marvellous. there are some basic pronounciation mistakes but not so much. if you pay attention to intonation ı think it will be better. thanks guys, good job...

    ReplyDelete
  108. 1ST GROUPS:
    Zeynep and her team's idea is creative and Zeynep's costume is making the video more interesting. But while you'r talking there is a problem, voices and the video isnt in an accordance. It must have been after loading it to the dailymotion. The sounds are audiable and the intonations can be more effective.

    The other group: Dilek could have talked with a more effective intonation for the news. Ece's performance is surely perfect.Tuğba's speech is effective too. Cong.

    ReplyDelete
  109. 1 Group
    ________________________________________________
    Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba

    Hhehe, I like your video very much. At the very beginning of the video Eda should wait just a few seconds before starting. On the other hand, your video likes a real news. Well done! Thank you all for a nice video!
    ------------------------------------------------

    Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak

    Well, your performances and the way you are speaking are pretty nice! On the contrary, there is a problem about news. It should be convincing. Apart from that problem, it's well done! Thank you all for this nice video!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2 Group

    Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş

    It's one of the best videos on this page, because the place, sounds and the subjects are well chosen. Everthing is suitable for a news video. We see all the necessary things that should be in a news in your video.Thank you all for a nice video!
    ________________________________________________

    Necdet Yılmaz, Zana Geçkin, Celal Doğan

    The news is very entertaining and funny. On the other hand, you should not use ''Mr...''. Except it, well done! Thank you all for that nice video!

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Group

    Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün

    It's very clear from the video that at the very beginning of the video you are reading the text written on the page. Actually, it does not like a breaking video because there is no hurry in your speech. Anyway, well Done! Thank you all for a nice video!
    ________________________________________________

    Mehmet Başdaş, Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç

    There is a little bit problem with the voive of Professor and I think it's just because of recorder or wind... On the other hand, you prepared the best video! Well done and thank you so much for a nice video!


    ErdemSunme

    ReplyDelete
  110. 6th videos topic vas exciting but ı cannot say the same thing for the video there are some pronounciation mistakes intonation faults and it was not so fluent but it is clear that you worked for your videos so much ı have never seen slide letter on the video for now. good job friends thank you...

    ReplyDelete
  111. 2ND GROUPS
    Fatma, Yusuf and Salih's video is a realistic one because of the topic. It is actually news. Yusuf begins the video very well and Salih's performance is god as well but Salih could have used te intonations more. As for Fatma, she is doing her job very well. She is informing us using the effective intonation. I liked your speech Fatma, well done!
    Zana and his group's work is a funny one. Necdet could hve talked a bit more and again the beginning of the video is very good. Thanks Celal.

    ReplyDelete
  112. 1.group: Eda Kılınç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba> the topic is really interesting=)Generally,you are speaking fluently but you can speak more lively.then your video can take more attention.especially,i liked Zeynep's acting:)Good job,cong.:)

    2.group:Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak> Your video is really well-prepared, but in some parts,I couldn't hear your voice.the rest is OK:)well done.

    3.group:Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş>
    Your video is one of the most I liked.I couldn't hear any mistakes.The only problem is about the light.but really good job,cong.:)

    4.group: Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan> ıt is really entertaining video:)it isn't boring.I really liked it.I think you are very skillful:)

    5.group: Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün> maybe anchorman should have spoken more fluently,also his looking at his paper distracted me a bit.I think the rest is good.cong.

    6.group: Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran> As I heard 'area' is mispronunced but the rest is OK.Good job.

    7.group: Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak> maybe it could have been better if you had memorised the text because looking at the text is distracting.but the video is generally good.cong.

    8.group: Maviş Cinal,Mehmet Başdaş and Latif Karakılınç> the video which I liked most.It is really flawless,everything is great.It is like real news,also your acting is really successful=)cong.

    ReplyDelete
  113. 7th video was alittle bit amateur when it compared with others.looking to the paper was so much. passes can be better. topic is good and video enjoyable but you can do better ı think. fluency can be better. good job girls thank you... 8th video is really hard for me to evaluate because in the google earth video because of my comments some both of you boys wrote me very bad comments like mine voice's being irritating but don't forget that it is my voice and ı have been using it for 21 years even though it was terrible ı cannot change my voice unfortunately. when it comes to the news and discussions videos of you maviş's performance was amazing ı feel she is like a native speaker and her speach was very fluent but ı cannot say the same thing for memhmet's speach actually it was hard to hear him, but ı think it is not your fault because of the recorder. latif spoke so natural ı liked it but there is a problem on the pronounciation of hospital word. video is very good organized but for your speaches you can do better ı think. thank you friends good job...

    ReplyDelete
  114. 3RD GROUPS
    Rahman is starting very well to the news but he can improve his speech. because it is news and you should be effective. just add some more stresses. Costumes are lovely and making the video and interesting one. The sounds arent very clear but it must be because of the technical problems after loading it to the page. Cong!
    Şıh Mehmt and his group's video is a well prepared one as well. however anchorwoman shouldnt have read her cntext that much. that was the only problem

    ReplyDelete
  115. THE REST OF THE 3RD GROUPS
    Kısmet and her group dont have an effective video. you could have been more careful and fluent.
    As for Latif, Maviş and Mehmet, it is a well prepared video, both techniclly and academically. intontions are used effectively. A natural video! well done

    ReplyDelete
  116. group 1
    your speaking is very well.presentation is perfect.only the ambiance isn't convenient.
    ismail memiş

    ReplyDelete
  117. 1.group(suzan,zeynep and eda):the topic of the news is rather interesting and attractive.I liked eda's and suzan's speech as usual again and in this video I also saw that zeynep was really successful while expressing the topic.Her gestures were nice.cong 2.group(ece,tuğba and dilek): the topic is not different or interesting but I really liked your performances,especially ece's.tuğba's voice is too low in some parts but except this everything is ok :) 3.group(fatma,yusuf,salih): Your video is really nice.there is almost no pronounciation mistake.your intonation is also well but the only irritating thing was light. 4.group(zana,necdet,celal):this video is so entertaining :) I liked neco's performance so much :)zana and celal's intonation is also rather well.cong :) 5.group(rahman,eyyüp,kadir):It is a well prepared video but maybe they could speak more fluently an they should be careful about some pronounciation mistakes. 6.gruop(hilal,cumali,şıh mehmet):The video is well in general but there are only some pronounciation mistakes. 7.group(betül,kısmet,aslı):I wish you hadn't read the news from the paper.It does not seem well but in general it is a nice video I liked the child :) 8.group(mehmet,maviş and latif):It is really well prepared video.cong:) your performances and organization are perfect.the only problem was the mehmet's voice.it's a bit low but not irritating.good job:)

    ReplyDelete
  118. 3rd group: rahman,kadir, eyyüp.. intonation was nearly all the time the same, needs accuracy i thnk, there is no mistakes in pronunciation i guess, howeever it is deficient in the intonation used in news&disc. programs.. but you prepared it well, i saw one thing i tried to do in my own video=(( i tried to add some other videos and pictures while we are speaking behind,but couldnt do it..anyway yours is a good one,too

    ReplyDelete
  119. 1st group,1st video :
    Cong. guys, it was a nice video and it was an interesting news ))
    Eda: Very successful pronunciation and great fluency, cong.
    Suzan: thanks for the useful information you gave )) well done
    Zeynep: I think it may be better if u speak in a more fluent way )


    1st group, 2nd video : It was a nice video.
    Dilek : Compared with a real speaker, u talk so slowly. It could have been better,if u had talked a bit faster.
    Ece : ur performance was super,cong.
    Tuğba: It was so hard for me to hear u. There are so many parts that i couldnt catch in ur speech,plz try to speak louder next time. It was a nice basketball show,by the way :P

    2nd group, 1st video: I can say that it was a good video. I couldn't catch so many earsplitting mistakes.
    Yusuf, were u inspired by Carl Azuz ? :D First up ... =)) It was a nice beginning
    Fatma: U were fluent as usual and there were no mistakes as far as i could hear
    Salih : I think u need to develop ur pronunciation,but good job anyway ..

    2nd group,2nd video : Necdet,Zana and Celal .. It was a strange video and topic. The only problem is that Zana's and Neco's voices were not that clear. Good jobs guys

    3rd group,1st video : I can say that u r all fluent while speaking. It was a succesful video. By the way, nice view .. :D well done guys

    3rd group,2nd video : It was a successful job.. There is not much mistake .. good jobs,cong

    3rd group,3rd video : I think it could have been better if u hadnt read from the text,cause it is very clear and does not sound and seem natural.. but good job anyway

    3rd group, 4th video : Guys, u were really amazing .. I think urs is the best ..
    Maviş is just like a news speaker with her appearance and nice accent.. :)
    Latif : U ve done a nice job as usual Lat .. oops sorry,not Lat but Mike :P :D
    Mehmet: U acted well too, cong. :)

    ReplyDelete
  120. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  121. group 1:for the first video prepared by eda kılınç zeyneb küçükoba and suzan atak l can say that thay ve done a good job.anyway l like the way eda and suzan speak.zeynep performed a well done job.cong....

    for the second video:perpared by tuba dilek and ece they did a good work.it was not so diffrent from the real program.tuba acted as a famous ece spoke very nice and dilek presnted the news so good.

    group2 the second video by fatma salih and yusuf was ok in general.yusuf and salih did a good speech mutually well but we couldnt see their faces.fatma was ok spoke so fluently.

    group3 first video done by kadir fırat eyüp akgün and rahman was intersting and good.rahman was was good like his other two friend...good invention and good work.cong.

    group3 second video l can say that they were very good.hilal spoke very nicely and fluently.şıh mehmet and cumali was also good.

    the video prepared by betül kısmet and aslı was ok but could be better readin bay heart

    the video prepared by maviş mehmet and latif was realy good.cong

    ReplyDelete
  122. 1. Group
    Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba

    Eda should wait a few minutes before starting your speech.There are no mistakes apart from this. it is very nice.



    Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak

    You are all speaking very fluently I like it very much there is a problem with the news I think because it did not convince me to believe.


    2 Group

    Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş

    it is a very nice video I think there isn’t any mistake I could catch in the video. Your performances are very very good.


    Necdet Yılmaz, Zana Geçkin, Celal Doğan

    first of all it is a very funny video. I laught it very much you are clever and creative but you shouldny say mr neco etc.



    3. Group

    Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün

    you shouldn’t read you speech so clear. Because it interrupts the audience. And you should give the impression that it is a breaking news.



    Mehmet Başdaş, Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç

    there is nothing to say about this video it is perfect. But I didn’t understand some sentences and words that prof said.

    ReplyDelete
  123. 1. video: (Suzan Atak-Eda Kılınç-Zeynep Küçükoba)

    Is it news or a daily show? You should have changed the form of the video. Yet, your gestures, pronunciations and intonation are fairly good. You prepared it well.
    ____________________________

    2.Video: Ece güzel-Tuğba Aydın- Dilek Demirayak


    To prepare a sport programme is a bit risky. Therefore, u should have chosen another topic. u have used your gestures well. Yet, u shoulld care about your intonation much more.
    ______________________________

    3. Video: Necdet Yılmaz-Zana geçkin-Celal Doğan


    This isn't a news program but a documentry about how to live long. Also, u should improve your intonation and gestures.
    _____________________________

    4.Video: Fatma Savaş-Yusuf Türen-Salih Güneş

    Your video is very dark so I had difficulty seeing your gestures. You should have given your news outside, for it is the news of an earthquake.
    ______________

    5. Video: Rahman Sağlam-Kadir Fırat-Eyüp Akgün

    I couldn't get in anything when Rahman was speaking. Yet, Kadir and Eyüp are good in terms of gestures and intonation. However, this is not news but a an advertisement of a device.

    ______________

    6.Video: Hilal Torun- Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran- Cumali Caran

    You should have spoken a bit more fluently. Then your video could be better. It is obvious that u have prepared it well. One of the best videos.

    _____________________

    7. Video: Betül Bekyiğit-Kısmet Turhan-Aslı Karaçokak

    You should have prepare it much better. For example, u could shoot it outside and your clothes could be suitable. I believe u can do it better.
    _________________________

    8. Video: Mehmet Başdaş-Latif Karakılınç-Maviş Cinal
    This İs our video. No word can comment it. :D:D

    ReplyDelete
  124. 1.grp1.video good job you were very succesfful. edas pronounciation and fluency is really good. she acted her role very well. suzan and zeynep were good too.

    2nd video congrats my friends:) dilek: you should have spoken a bit faster. it would be better. tuba: voice was hard to hear. the show was perfect
    ece: voice is clear and you were fluent good job

    2.grp 1st video congrats .it was a good video. u were very good. fatmas voice and pronounciation is perfect.

    2.video your news is intersting one. neco and zana: voice is not clear ı think this is only problem.the rest is ok celal: voice is clear and understanble .good job

    3.grp 1.video
    congrats you all speak fluently. but ı couldnt understand all the parts. you all good.
    3grp 2. video
    congrats good job there arent clear mistakes.
    3grp 3.video
    congrats it would be better if you hadnt read from the text. good job thnks.
    3grp 4.video
    it s well prepared one. good job, congrats. you worked on it so much. ı liked yours the most

    ReplyDelete
  125. the 1st video: Eda: you speak fluently and use your mimics effectively well done :) suzan: You also speak fluently but stress some words too much this may be disadvantegeous for you. you also use your mimics effectively thanks :) zeynep: I admired your clothes and your attitude. the only problem was that You spoke a itle and not fluently. be careful for this :) Generally, the topic was very interesting and it was a good example of discussion programme :)conrulations for your good job :))

    ReplyDelete
  126. the 2nd video: Your topic is also different from the others. Dilek: You behave like a real anchorwoman :) but your fluency is not enough. Ece: Your pronounciation and fluency is good and act your role ver well Tugba: I couldn' t hear your voice very well. be loud the next time. ı also make a comment about the show that you did. perfect! what a great basketball player wooowwwww :D :)) well done!

    ReplyDelete
  127. the 3rd video: Yusuf: Your voice was a bit irritating. I don't know why! You speak fluently and try not to make mistake well done :) salih: be fluent and loud please. Anyway your speech was good. Fatma: Why did you speak a little? no matter! :) You are careful about your intonation and pronounciation. your fluency is very good. The topic (earthquake) was usual but the general performance was good. I felt that ı was really watching the news cong. :))

    ReplyDelete
  128. the 4th video: Celal: I am terribly sorry that ı didn't like your performance as you spoke a little. be fluent the next time :) zana: ımmm ı could barely hear your voice. ıt may result from the noise coming from outside as you acted outside near the sea :) You speak well but not fluently. Necdet: I am sorry ı couldn't hear your voice cleary. as ı could hear, you speak well but a bit slowly. ı also would like that you dance wery well. you are very talented. while watching you, ı couldn't stand laughing :)) good job thanks

    ReplyDelete
  129. 5th video: you used some pictures which was interesting. You speak well but have some mistakes. furthermore; you read yout text which interrupts the watcher :) anyway it was good thanks

    ReplyDelete
  130. the 6th video: Hilal your speech attracted me as you talk fluently and act your role seriously. The rest is also careful about intonation and pronounciation. The scene that the earthquake hit was shown to us and it was a good example thanks for a good job well done :))

    ReplyDelete
  131. the 7th video: I liked the child a lot. You read in some parts of the video but your speech is generally good :)) The topic and the role that you acted was pretty. the decoration and the clothes are well prepared. well done :)

    ReplyDelete
  132. the 8th video: Maviş: are u a native speaker??? What can ı say in that case? perfect, perfect and again perfect :)) cong. mehmet: ı couldn't hear your voice clearly because of the noise coming from the hospital. Your fulency is good and behaved like a real prof. :) latif: your speech could be better maybe more fluent thanks for your good job :)

    ReplyDelete
  133. the video by Betül and her friends is a good one, but that the anchorman is reading from the paper on the table is abit irritating..for the rest, there wasnt any important problem related to the intonation and spelling...but u could be better..cong..

    ReplyDelete
  134. 1st Group - 1st Video Eda KİLINÇ/ Suzan ATAK/ Zeynep KÜÇÜKOBA

    The video is good in general. The mother exaggerates; once she says "I'm very happy with this miracle of God" and then she says "I need economic support,please..." Intonations are very good, i cudnt catch any pronunciation mistake.
    Cong Mates :)

    ------------------------------------------------

    1st Group - 2nd Video Ece GÜZEL/ Tuğba AYDIN/ Dilek DEMİRAYAK

    The Anchor woman (Dilek) speaks a lil bit slowly.. The topic is kinda weird but it is good in general, as well. I guess there is some technical problem with the voice of the video.So, I cudnt hear any mistake for mispronunciation. In my opinion, next time you should pay a lil bit more attention to ur intonation. By the way, grats to Tuğba( basketball girl), I loved that basket !

    Grats Mates :)

    ---------------------------------------------
    2nd Group - 1st Video Fatma SAVAŞ/ Yusuf TÜREN/ Salih GÜNEŞ

    I liked the way that News begins. I cudnt catch any mispronunciation, good intonation. I liked the way that video ends, as well.

    Cong. Mates :)


    ------------------------------------------------

    2nd Group - 2nd Video Necdet YILMAZ/ Zana GEÇKİN/ Celal DOĞAN

    I did like the way Celal began the news and his different perspectives :D There is no mispronunciation and the intonation is good. I cudnt help myself not to touch on the topic. Really funny ! :)

    Cong. Mates :)


    ----------------------------------------------

    Group 3rd - 1st Video Rahman Sağlam/ Kadir Fırat/ Eyyüp Akgün

    This is a good video. The topic is ok, very good intonation. There is nothin bad but the word " Charger", i guess. You sound "ş" insteah of "ç"
    CHARGER /ˈtʃɑː.dʒər /US-ˈtʃɑːr.dʒɚ/
    CHARGE /tʃɑːdʒ/

    Welldone.. Grats mates :)


    ---------------------------------------------

    Group 3rd - 2nd Video Hilal Torun/ Cumali Caran/ Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran

    The topic is ok and on the agenda. Intonation is good as well, but there is a serious voice problem I guess. Also, the backsound is too high. In general, it's ok.

    Gratz friends. :)

    ------------------------------------

    3rd Group - 3rd Video Betül Bekyiğit/ Kısmet Turhan/ Aslı Karaçokak

    Oh God.. You girls are so creative ! :) I suppose that the mic is a hair straightener of one of you and the little girl becomes a litle girl by being on her knees :))This is a very good video. Good intonation and pronunciation. There is no prob with ur video but the backsound's bein very high. Good job !

    Cong. Girls :)

    ------------------------------------------------

    3rd Group - 4th Video Mehmet Başdaş/ Maviş Cinal/ Latif Karakılınç

    MLM (emelem) News..a pretty good and funny name :) There is no pronunciation mistake and u have really good intonation. The topic is clear, the video really looks as if it is a real News video. A lil lil bit thing is that Mehmet's (the doc.) voice is low ..
    Pretty good mates. Congratulations.. :)

    ReplyDelete
  135. 1.group: Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba
    i think it is an interesting news. when it comes to intonation and pronunciation there is no mistake especially i like the way anchorwoman speak. good job. cong..

    2.group: Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak
    it is a good video and i like it. maybe dilek could speak fluently. good job. cong.
    3.group: Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş
    as my friends mentioned before everything is good but it is hard to see you clearly. good job. cong.

    4.group: Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan
    it is both interesting and good video. i couldnt understand some parts and i think it is because of wind. generally it is well prepared. cong.

    5.group: Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün
    I could not understand some parts. generally it is good and well prepared. cong.

    8.group: Mehmet Başdaş,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç
    i like your video is so much and i think it is the best one.cong..

    ReplyDelete
  136. group 3; 4th video: Maviş, Latif and Mehmet: as everyone said before, it seems just like real news with the help technology's advanced usage by you(guess mehmet's) :)when it comes to the speech, on the whole eveything is okay, especially Maviş's speech, so fluent with no mistakes. latif your speech sounds as if u are emphasizing "r" voice too much, especilally while saying "barrier". mehmet's voice is a bit low, you were outside so there was too much noise. briefly, your video deserves good comments =))

    ReplyDelete
  137. 1.wideo: ı like the anchorwoman's speaking very much, it is very clear and fluent. the topic is well-thinked and well-organized. godd job. cong.

    2.wideo: showing news'pic. is effective and the video is good. ı liked the mini-show, good job. cong.

    3. wideo: ıt has news quality and studio effect. Fatma's speech is very fluent and effective, the others should be more lively and the video is a bit dark but it is really good anyway. cong.

    4.wideo: this video is funny and well-thinked. ı liked the topic, speeches could be more active, the last show is good:)) cong.

    5.video: topic and the pictures related to it are good and creative:) ı liked your mic.:)) cong.

    6.video: it's effective using real videos about the explained topic. it's creative and lively, also your speeches are good:) cong.

    8.video: this is really good and gives an effect that it is a real news.there isn't much to say cong.:)

    ReplyDelete
  138. GROUP 1
    1st video, done by Eda,Suzan and Zeynep:
    First of all,the subject intrigues people. I liked Zeynep's custom:) But, if Eda spoke a bit faster, it would have been better. I liked the video. Thanks.
    2nd video,done by Ece, Tugba and Dilek:
    In fact, that is a nice video.It would be more attractive if The speaker-caster spoke faster next time. Well done..
    GROUP 2
    1st video, done by Fatma, Salih and Yusuf:
    The beginning is good. Introduction speech Yusuf used is fine. "First up". I liked the questions directed to the guest. Good job. Intonation is good.

    2nd video, by Celal, Zana, Neco:
    Why does not this man die:))That is a sensational topic. It is a funny news video:) But, you had better pay attention to your pronunciations.. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  139. GROUP 3
    1st video by Rahman, Kadir, Eyyüp:
    It is again a fine video. You showed the things you present. It is good. Thanks..

    2nd video Hilal, Cumali and Şıh Mehmet:
    You are all god. I like it.Thank you..

    3rd video done by Kısmet, Betül, Aslı:
    I think it would be better if you use your pronunciation in a better way Betül..But, generally ı liked your video..good job.thank you..
    4th video Maviş, Latif and Mehmet:

    To be frank it is the video ı liked most. It is a well organized news video..The intonation is used appropriatly. I could not hear Mehmet exactly. But, the transitions are perfect. Especially,the form of anchormans and speaker-caster who were adjoined. Good job friends.. cong.:))

    ReplyDelete
  140. Group 1: ı think they were good at pronunciation, and they were speaking fluently. in terms of the program, they have shown the right form of news and discussion programs. the things that are needed for it take place in this video. each speaker has talked in the video.

    ReplyDelete
  141. group 1 and second video: firstly, it is okey for the news and discussion program. However, there is an irritating voice coming from back. except for the bad voice they are successful. ı can't hear the voice rightly.

    ReplyDelete
  142. group 2 and first video: I knoewq that they shouln't use specific names such as Mersin, Haiti. the format of the program is acceptable, sharing the speeches is good of them. the speech is understandable enough .the voice can be heard weell.

    ReplyDelete
  143. group 2 and second video: the voice is audible and they are speaking fluently. they have shown a good example of news and discussion program to us, yet they should be a bit careful about not to use some specific names at the park.slso ther is voice coming from back and it seems someone is speaking at the same time with him.

    ReplyDelete
  144. group 3 and video 1: the format of the program is well. the voice is audible. Also the speech is fluent. there is no problem with the video, too.

    ReplyDelete
  145. group 3 and second video: I think this video is one of the best videos ı have ever watched. they have been good at pronunciation. I can hear the voices eaasily. it is one of the simples of news and discussion program. it is okey.

    ReplyDelete
  146. 1st GROUP: The first video that is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba:It is a well prepared video but it resembles a daily show not a news or a discussion program. it may be a discussion program I think.the speaker's speech should be more lively.But it is a good and unusual topic.thanks.---------------------------------------------------------------------
    1st GROUP: The second video which was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak:It is a cheerful video and your speeches are well but it should be a bit fluent.meanwhile, your gestures and mimics are very good.actually, it is a good video.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş: I think it is a well prepared video but it is a bit dark .The idea of slides and using studio is necessary and important for the news.Fatma's intonation is well and her speech is fluent. It is a successful video mostly.Thanks a lot::))---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan:It is a funny, strange video and topic.I liked it but it is not a news or a discussion program. It should be developed your fluency in speaking. You should be use your gestures and mimics.Thanks a lot...------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    3rd GROUP: The first video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün:Sometimes,your speeches aren't understood because of the camera you used I think.Rahman should be more relaxed and maybe a bit slower.It will be more better the next time I think. Kadir and Eyyüp's speeches are very well. it is understandable. Eyyüp uses his intonation and gestures or mimics well.Fluency is ok!!!Congratulations!!!-------------------------------------------------------------------------
    3rd GROUP: The second video which was done by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran:The best video I have ever watched.Congratulations my dear friends::))Only,It must be a bit fluent.--------------------------------------------------------
    3rd GROUP: The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak:Betül and Kısmet are reading the news but it is a breaking news, isn't it? It shouldn't be read.Aslı is very good in terms of intonation and gestures,mimics.I think It is a miracle::):))::))Congratulations!!!It will be better in the next time::))---------------------------------------------------------------------
    3rd GROUP: The fourth video is done by Maviş Cinal, Latif Karakılınç and Mehmet Başdaş:It is one of the best video I have ever watched.Maviş is perfect I think.She is speaking as if she is a native speaker and she resembles a real speaker I think.Mehmet and Latif are speaking fluently but sometimes their speeches are not understood because of the noises.But it is a good idea for going a real location.It was more factual.Congratulations!!!My dear friends...----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  147. I heard some pronunciation mistakes, yet it is well prepared in fact. also it is suitable for the news and discussion program.it is common topic.congg

    ReplyDelete
  148. group 3 and the last video by mehmet, latif and maviş: except for a bad voice with the second part, it is well prepared , too. it is good for the format of a news and discussion program. cong there is n o problem with the pronunciation.

    ReplyDelete
  149. the video by Maviş and her friends was one of the best one....l liked it..maviş speaks like a native speaker..in addition, others were also good..

    ReplyDelete
  150. the video by rahman sağlam and his friends....it is a well-prepared one..the anchorman could speak a bit more quickly and fluently...except this i could not catch any mistake..cong..

    ReplyDelete
  151. the video by hilal torun and her friends..i think you worked well on it.your costumes are suitable for it..your pronouncation and intonation also were not bad..it could be better...cong...

    ReplyDelete
  152. group 1:
    video is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba: ı think the video is successful. anchorwoman speaks fluently but the woman having two babies cant speak well. maybe it would have been better if she had spoken more fluently. ı wanna say there are some pronunciation mistakes. in general, the video is succesful.

    video is done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak:the speech of anchorwoman is really unsuccessful. an anchorwoman speaks fluently but unfortunately dilek is bad. Despite the failure of speech, her clothes, style of her hair and makeup is really suitable for a news program. in addition, two girls in the basketball court is not bad. sometimes ı couldnt catch words spoken because of recorder.

    group2:
    video is done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan: ı think this video is not suitable for a news program. first of all, they mispronounce some words. also they dont speak fluently. ı think they should have spoken fluently in order to make this video suitable for news program. in addition, it could be better if they had used their surnames instead of names.

    group 3:
    video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün: sometimes your voices are really complicated because of recorder but ı think the video is well-prepared. especially it is a good idea they show us the photos of this machine. cong:)

    group4:
    video is done by Maviş Cinal, Latif Karakılınç and Mehmet Başdaş: ı think this video is the best one among these news programs. your speechs are really succesful. sometimes ı couldnt understand mehmet's speech but especially maviş completely looks like a anchorwoman. her intonation and pronounciation are also perfect.congratulations:)

    and ı wanna state that ı couldnt watch some videos.

    ReplyDelete
  153. 1st GROUP: The first video that is done by Eda Kılıç, Suzan Atak and Zeynep Küçükoba:
    Although pronunciations, gestures and activations are good for this video, I didn’t decide on whether the video was a new and discussion program or not. Accept from this, I liked your video and the topic. You are very succesfull.


    1st GROUP: The second video which was done by Ece Güzel, Tuğba Aydın and Dilek Demirayak:
    Your video is really good, I think. You gave importance your intonations, pronunciations and the topic. It makes the video better. I think because of the camera or recorder there is problem, I couldn’t understand some parts especially in the court. By the way, at the beginning, Dilek’s speech could be better.


    2nd GROUP: The first video which was done by Fatma Savaş, Yusuf Türen, Salih Güneş:
    The opinion and the topic of the video are great. I liked your video because it is shown like a really news and discussion programs. I think Salih’s and Yusuf’s intonations could be better. Fatma!s intonations and pronunciations are great. Good job! Cong. :D



    2nd GROUP: The second video which was done by Necdet Yılmaz,Zana Geçkin,Celal Doğan:
    The topic of your video is interesting and entertaining. Your speeches could be better. Pronunciations and gestures are great. Your folk dance is affecting:D. Cong.



    3rd GROUP: The first video which was done by Rahman Sağlam, Kadir Fırat and Eyyüp Akgün:
    First of all, the topic of the video is great, I liked it. Your speeches, gestures, intonatios and pronunciations are good enough, but Rahman could speak more fluently. The beginning and the end of the new are also suitable with news and discussion programs.


    3rd GROUP: The second video which was done by Hilal Torun, Cumali Caran and Şıh Mehmet Kurtaran:
    The beginning of the video and the topic are really good. Your intonations and gestures are good. I liked your video. Pronunciations could be better. Good job! Cong.


    3rd GROUP: The third video is done by Betül Bekyiğit, Kısmet Turhan and Aslı Karaçokak:
    Your pronunciations, intonations, gestures are great. The music is suitable with the video.Cong.


    3rd GROUP: The fourth video is done by Mehmet Başdaş,Maviş Cinal and Latif Karakılınç :

    From the beginning to the end, it was really good. All of you presented a good new. Your pronunciations, intonations and activations are affecting. Maviş, you can do this job, I think, it suits with you :D. Because of the camera, there are some problems with voice in some parts of the video, but it doesn’t matter because it is one of the best. Cong :D.

    ReplyDelete
  154. Group 1 : Eda,Suzan,Zeynep: I liked Eda's the style of presenting the new,but maybe the other two friends could speak a bit more fluently by trying awake the watchers.Anyway,in general it is a good video thank you friends.

    Group 2 : Dilek,Tuğba,Ece: I think Dilek could speak more lively and there is an irritating voice coming from outside which interrupted me from heraing the sentences clearly.Also,maybe it should be longer.

    Group3: Fatma,Yusuf,Salih: Yusuf is speaking fastly without emphasis.His speech should have some pauses I think,but I liked Fatma's presenting the new; on the other hand there should be some pauses in her speech.

    Group 4 : Necdet,Zana,Celal: I think they should speak more fluently by trying to awake the watchers and I couldn't understand some of the sentences because they were as if they are talking from a deep place.

    Group 5 : Rahman,Eyüp,Kdir: I really liked this video .It is a succesful one and I liked the performances of my friends.They are speaking fluently.Thank you friends.

    Group 6 : Hilal,Şıh Mehmet,Cumali:
    It is a noteworty and realistic video and I really liked the style of Hilal's presenting the new.She is succesful.Also, I liked the performance of Şıh Mehmet, but maybe Cumali could speak more lively.

    Group 7: Betül,Aslı,Kısmet:
    Kısmet your voice is too low again!:))Aslı's performance is really goodand also Betül shows a good performance ,it is a good video thank you friends.

    Group 8 : Maviş, as always you are so succesful.I have nothing to say.Latif, you are a good speaker,you could make me feel as if it is a real new and Mehmet you are of course succesful but I wish your voice were a bit more loud.Generally,I want to say that it is a well prepared video.Thank you for your effort.

    ReplyDelete